LGG-11. UNDERSTANDING THE TRANSCRIPTIONAL HETEROGENEITY OF PEDIATRIC LOW-GRADE GLIOMAS AND ITS IMPLICATION FOR TUMOR PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs) are the most frequent brain tumors in children and comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors with different locations, histologic subtypes, ages at presentation, and clinical behavior. Tumors frequently respond to treatment with chemotherapy or radiation therapy, but they can regrow after a period of quiescence, requiring further therapy. Thus, a deeper understanding of the molecular processes involved in these tumors is required to develop therapeutic strategies that are effective against their disease mechanisms. METHODS To better understand the cellular behaviors of this heterogenous group of tumors, we have employed single-cell and single-nuclei RNA sequencing technologies to analyze a large-scale dataset (>250,000 cells) of 55 pLGGs across many histological subtypes (pilocytic astrocytoma, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, pilomyxoid astrocytoma, DNET, ganglioglioma, RGNT, diffuse astrocytoma, SEGA, glioneuronal, oligodendroglioma). RESULTS Analysis of this data identified a heterogenous population of cell types and cell states, detecting mature and progenitor-like astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, as well as cells exhibiting senescence or cycling programs. Moreover, we identify a significant immune infiltrate, comprised primarily of microglia. In addition to heterogeneity within pLGG tumors, heterogeneity between LGG subtypes represents another layer that stratifies pLGG biology. We performed a compositional analysis of the cell types present in these tumors and compared transcription signatures and gene expression programs across shared cellular populations of histologically and genetically distinct pLGGs. Finally, we used spatial transcriptomic data to investigate and annotate the cellular architecture of multiple pLGGs with BRAF mutations and draw comparisons to findings from our single-cell and single-nuclei transcriptomic analysis. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis of human pLGGs at the single-cell and single-nuclei resolution provides critical insight into the heterogenous biological activities that constitute these tumors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".