MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399785874 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae064.278

GCT-23. LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP AND SURVIVALS OF PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM NON-GERMINOMATOUS GERM CELL TUMORS (NGGCT) ENROLLED ON ACNS1123: A CHILDREN’S ONCOLOGY GROUP (COG) STUDY

2024· article· en· W4399785874 on OpenAlexaff
Girish Dhall, Yu Wang, Arzu Onar‐Thomas, Dennis Shaw, Shannon M. MacDonald, Erin S. Murphy, Soumen Khatua, Ute Bartels, Jason Fangusaro

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSickKids Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCogMedicineCentral nervous systemOncologyGerm cell tumorsInternal medicineTerm (time)Germ cellPediatricsBiologyChemotherapyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND ACNS1123 was a Phase 2 study to determine whether irradiation could be safely reduced without impacting survival in a subgroup of NGGCT patients. METHODS Patients with localized disease who achieved a complete (CR) or partial response (PR) to induction chemotherapy were eligible to receive reduced dose/volume of irradiation to 30.6Gy whole ventricular field with 54Gy tumor-bed boost. RESULTS 107 eligible NGGCT patients were accrued. The median age of patients at enrollment was 11 years (3.7-21.6). Eighty patients (75%) were male. Location was pineal in 58 (55%), suprasellar in 37 (35%), ventricles in 6 (6%), and bifocal in 6 patients (6%). Sixty-six (61.7%) patients achieved a CR/PR post-induction and were eligible and evaluable for the primary objective and received reduced dose and volume of irradiation. Eight patients progressed; 6 had a distant spinal relapse (outside the irradiation field) and 2 had a local plus distant relapse. As of December 31, 2023, the median follow-up time for eligible and evaluable patients was 5.6 years (0.9-7.9) from enrollment. Except for an unrelated death due to SARS-CoV-2 at 5.5 years from enrollment, there were no grade 3 or higher adverse events at the 60-month follow-up timepoint and no disease progressions beyond 2 years. The 5-year progression-free and overall survival for all eligible and evaluable patients are 87.9% (95% CI:79%-94.8%) and 92.4% (95% CI:82.8%- 96.8%), respectively. CONCLUSION Although the study was closed prematurely due to the concern of increased spinal relapse, the current data suggest that most patients with localized NGGCT and a CR/PR to chemotherapy will survive long-term, and, in fact, have similar survival (PFS and OS) to patients enrolled on ACNS0122 who received full dose craniospinal irradiation. The key to future biologic studies and clinical trials is identifying at diagnosis those patients at high risk for relapse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→