The role of the carapace in the accumulation of metals from seawater in the green crab (Carcinus maenas): Studies with radio-labeled calcium, zinc, and nickel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of the carapace in the uptake and storage of newly accumulated metals was investigated in the green crab exposed to environmentally relevant concentrations of calcium ([Ca] = 389 mg L−1 or 9.7 mmol L−1), zinc ([Zn] = 82 μg L−1 or 1.25 μmol L−1), and nickel ([Ni] = 8.2 μg L−1 or 0.14 μmol L−1) in 12 °C seawater, using radio-tracers (45Ca, 65Zn, 63Ni). After 24-h exposure, carapace exhibited the highest concentration of newly accumulated Ca, whereas carapace and gills exhibited the highest concentrations of both newly accumulated Zn and Ni relative to other tissues. For all three metals, the carapace accounted for >85 % of the total body burden. Acute temperature changes (to 2 °C and 22 °C) revealed the highest overall temperature coefficient Q10 (2.15) for Ca uptake into the carapace, intermediate Q10 for Ni (1.87) and lowest Q10 (1.45) for Zn. New Ca uptake into the carapace continued linearly with time for 24 h, new Zn uptake gradually deviated from linearity, whereas Ni uptake reached a plateau by 6 h. Attachment of a rubber membrane to the dorsal carapace, thereby shielding about 20 % of the total crab surface area from the external water, eliminated both new Zn and Ni incorporation into the shielded carapace, whereas 36 % of new Ca incorporation persisted. When recently euthanized crabs were exposed, new Zn uptake into the carapace remained unchanged, whereas Ca and Ni uptake were reduced by 89 % and 71 %, respectively. We conclude that the carapace is a very important uptake and storage site for all three metals. All of the uptake of new Zn and new Ni, and most of the uptake of new Ca into this tissue comes directly from the external water. For Zn, the mechanism involves only physicochemical processes, whereas for Ca and Ni, life-dependent processes make the major contribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".