BIOM-03. IMMUNO-ONCOLOGIC PROFILING OF PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS REVEALS MAJOR CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TUMOR IMMUNE MICROENVIRONMENT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract With the success of immunotherapy in cancer, understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) has become increasingly important; however in pediatric brain tumors this remains poorly characterized. Accordingly, we developed a clinical immune-oncology gene expression assay, including the 18-gene tumor inflammation signature (TIS) as a marker of overall immune activation, and validated this with immunohistochemistry for key cell-type markers. We used this assay, in conjunction with public data from the Pediatric Brain Tumor Atlas (PBTA), to profile a diverse range of 1382 samples in total with detailed clinical and molecular annotation. Overall among the main types of pediatric brain tumors, low-grade gliomas (LGG) had the highest inflammation levels (regardless of genetic driver alteration) and medulloblastomas the lowest. In LGG we identified three distinct patterns of immune activation with prognostic significance in BRAF V600E-mutant tumors, specifically that higher inflammation predicted worse outcomes. In high-grade gliomas (HGG), we observed immune activation and T-cell infiltrates in tumors that have historically been considered exclusively immune cold. There were genomic correlates of inflammation levels, with BRAF-V600E-mutant HGG having the highest inflammation levels and suggesting these may be candidates for combination MEK inhibition and immunotherapy. In mismatch repair deficient HGG, we found that high TIS was a significant predictor of response to immune checkpoint inhibition, and demonstrated the potential for multimodal biomarkers (TIS plus tumor mutation burden) to improve treatment stratification. Importantly, while overall patterns of immune activation were observed for histologically and genetically defined tumor types, there was significant variability within each entity, indicating that the TIME must be evaluated as an independent feature from diagnosis. In sum, in addition to the histology and molecular profile, this work underscores the importance of reporting on the TIME as an essential axis of cancer diagnosis in the era of personalized medicine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".