MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399787597 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae064.458

MDB-09. WNT AND GROUP 4 MEDULLOBLASTOMAS OF EARLY CHILDHOOD TREATED WITH HIGH DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY AND CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION SPARING APPROACH

2024· article· en· W4399787597 on OpenAlexaff
Rose Daynielle A Cansanay, Craig Erker, Erin Ratterman, Mary Pat Schlosser, Rebecca Ronsley, Chantel Cacciotti, Juliette Hukin, Sylvia Cheng, Natasha Pillay‐Smiley, Vanan Magimairajan, Andrew Cluster, Mohamed S Abdelbaki, Ashley Margol, George Michael, Susan Chi, Ralph Salloum, Vijay Ramaswamy, Michal Zápotocký, Vicente Santa Maria Lopez, Helene Toledano, Kathleen Dorris, Martin Mynarek, Stefan Rutkowski, Álvaro Lassaletta, Éric Bouffet, Lucie Lafay‐Cousin

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenCancerCare ManitobaBC Children's HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Alberta HospitalIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedulloblastomaChemotherapyMedicineOncologyInternal medicineCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND WNT and group 4 medulloblastoma (MB) are rare in young children and their outcome when treated with radiation avoidance infant strategies is unknown. METHOD This retrospective international cohort included children less than 7 years of age, with molecularly characterized group 4 or WNT MB, treated with high-dose chemotherapy(HDC) and CSI sparing approach. RESULTS The current cohort includes 29 patients (19M/10F). For the 26 patients with group 4 MB (median age at diagnosis 45.9 months), 16 (61.5%) were M0 and 17 (65.3%) underwent initial gross total resection (GTR). The most common consolidation regimen used was three cycles of high dose carboplatin and thiotepa (65.5%) or a single cycle of high dose of carboplatin, etoposide and thiotepa (31%).Two received adjuvant focal radiotherapy. Sixteen patients (61.5%) relapsed at a median time of 21.4 months from diagnosis (median age of 5.2 years). Relapse was local for 50% of the patients. One patient underwent palliative management and 15 received radiation-based salvage therapy (2 focal, 13 CSI+/- boost).The median dose of CSI was 36Gy (18-36). Five of the 15 died of disease. Overall, at a median follow-up of 37.9 months from diagnosis, 17/26 (65.3%) patients were alive, six had died of disease and two of toxicity. All 3 WNT patients (median age at diagnosis 57.8 months) underwent GTR and two were M0. Two received sequential high dose carboplatin and thiotepa. One patient with initial partial response, progressed 2 months after treatment completion and received salvaged CSI (18Gy). All of them were alive at a median follow up of 88 months from diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS HDC and CSI sparing approaches led to a high rate of relapse for young patient with group 4 (61.5%). However, 2/3 were salvaged with radiation-based therapy given at a median age 5.2 yrs. Additional WNT patients are needed to better describe their management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207