MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399788453 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae064.611

QOL-23. POTENTIAL MYELIN REPAIR AFTER IRRADIATED PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR: A MAGNETIZATION TRANSFER IMAGING ANALYSIS

2024· article· en· W4399788453 on OpenAlexaff
Éloïse Baudou, Julie Tseng, Jennifer Ryan, Éric Bouffet, Ute Bartels, Brian W. Timmons, Cynthia de Medeiros, Donald Mabbott

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetization transferMyelinMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingNuclear magnetic resonanceNeurosciencePsychologyRadiologyInternal medicinePhysicsCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Exercise training and metformin treatment may improve cognition after cranial irradiation in pediatric brain tumors (PBT), but the neuronal mechanisms underlying the effect of these interventions remains unknown. Magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) is an imaging technique that may be sensitive to white matter microstructure – including myelin. METHODS In this work, we analyzed changes in magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) over a 12-week period in irradiated PBT survivors who participated in pilot clinical trials entailing 12 weeks of exercise training (exercise group, n=17), or metformin treatment (n=12). Pre- and post-intervention assessment included MRI scanning and neurocognitive tests. A no intervention control group, (n=7) was also included and seen before and after a 12 week period of time. We used a longitudinal Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) approach to analyze differences in MTR across the 12 weeks in the three groups, using as covariates: age at baseline, sex, handedness, age at diagnosis and delay from diagnosis. Then we performed correlations between mean MTR changes and behavioral outcomes. RESULTS Clusters of significant increase in MTR were observed in the right temporal lobe in the exercise group after intervention and in the right minor forceps in the metformin group after treatment. These changes respectively correlated with higher performance in free recall score in exercise group and with higher performances in inhibitory control and attention in metformin group. There was no difference in MTR changes between groups nor within the control group. DISCUSSION This exploratory work suggests either a 12-week period of exercise training or metformin may promote myelination in PBT survivors in brain regions. These changes appear to be associated with improved memory and executive function, two core domains of neurocognitive deficit in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→