(039) DIVERSITY OF CAUSES OF DYSPAREUNIA IN REAL CLINICAL PRACTICE IN THE OUTPATIENT GYNECOLOGY DEPARTMENT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Dyspareunia is a women's sexual health problem that still often goes undiagnosed, despite its high prevalence and negative impact on sexual, marital and psychological well-being. Genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD) refers to significant pain and difficulty with penetrative sex that lasts for at least six months and might be caused by various diseases alone and their combinations. Objective Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine the contribution of different conditions to the total number of patients who applied for a primary appointment for GPPPD. Methods Women who agreed to participate in the study were presenting complaints on painful intercourse or inability to have intercourse for more than 6 months. Patients underwent a gynecological examination consisted of inspection, Q-tip testing, pelvic floor muscle testing and bimanual palpation in the lithotomy position (if it was possible). Diagnoses were documented according to the International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision World Health Organization guidelines. Pain was assessed via the McGill Pain Questionnaire and a visual analogue scale. Assessment of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction was based on an International Continence Society report on the terminology for pelvic floor muscle assessment. Vulvar pain conditions were classified based on the consensus vulvar pain terminology committee of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease, the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health, and International Pelvic Pain Society. Statistical analyses were performed by SPSS Statistics. Results The average age of the examined women was 30,63±0,69 years. As a cause of GPPPD vaginismus and dyspareunia were diagnosed in 19.31 and 80.69 % respectively. Predominant cause of dyspareunia was pelvic floor muscles dysfunction (66,19%) which was combined with other pathologies (scar deformity of the perineum, endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain, candidiasis, etc.) in 20 cases. The percentage of women diagnosed with endometriosis without the formation of central pain mechanisms was 11.36%. The overlapping chronic pain conditions such as migraine, interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, endometriosis and vulvodynia were diagnosed in 21.13% patients with dyspareunia. Dyspareunia due to vaginal atrophy associated with lactation, combined oral contraception use and menopause was diagnosed in 4 patients (2.82%, 1.41% and 1.41%, respectively). Scar changes of the perineum due to traumatic delivery or episiotomy amounted to 4.23%. Lichen planus was diagnosed in one patient (1.41%). Vulvodynia was diagnosed in 8 patients with dyspareunia (11.26%) and was associated with pelvic floor tension myalgia and pelvic floor myofascial pain syndrome in 75% of cases. Conclusions GPPPD can be caused by various conditions with significant involvement of the pelvic floor muscles in the process of pain formation. Taking into account the risk of overlapping chronic pain conditions, a multidisciplinary approach is required in the treatment of this group of patients. Disclosure No.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".