MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399798914 · doi:10.5267/j.ccl.2024.3.005

Synthesis, antimicrobial activity, DFT-calculation, and docking of 4-(1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-containing polysubstituted pyrroles

2024· article· en· W4399798914 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sergiy Kemskyi, A. N. Grozav, В. А. Чорноус, N. D. Yakovychuk, Mariana Z. Fedoriv, Dmytro Melnyk, Oksana Melnyk, М. В. Вовк

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Chemistry Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and biological activity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEnamine
KeywordsChemistryAntimicrobialDocking (animal)Combinatorial chemistryComputational chemistryStereochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of new 4-(1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-containing polysubstituted pyrroles 3 a-k has been synthesized by a preparative convenient method from ethyl 5-chloro-4-formyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylates 1 a-e, which were selectively transformed into the corresponding polysubstituted pyrrole-4-carboxylic acids 2 а-е using sodium hypochlorite as an oxidizer. Further, they were transformed into the target compounds with a high yield using the cyclocondensation with N-mono- or N,N-disubstituted thiosemicarbazides in the boiling phosphorus trichloroxide. As seen from the screening of antimicrobial activity, the synthesized compounds exhibit the inhibiting and bactericide activity against some bacteria and fungi. The highest activity has been established for the compounds 3 a, c, e-h, j against the strain Klebsiella pneumoniae (МІС=31.25 µg/mL). The calculated HOMO energy level proves that the compound 3 с is the most reactive ligand for the interaction with a protein receptor. The molecular docking data show that the compound 3 h has the highest affinity to the ThiM Klebsiella pneumoniae kinase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Chemistry LettersSame topicSynthesis and biological activityFrench-language works237,207