MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399809088 · doi:10.1080/26895269.2024.2366881

Mental health and wellbeing outcomes associated with social, medical, and legal gender affirmation among trans young people in Australia

2024· article· en· W4399809088 on OpenAlexaff
Ruby Grant, Natalie Amos, Ashleigh Lin, Teddy Cook, Adam O. Hill, Ken C. Pang, Rachel S. Skinner, Marina Carman, Adam Bourne

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Transgender Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
FundersAustralian Institute of Health and Welfare, Australian GovernmentNational Health and Medical Research CouncilDepartment of Health, New South Wales GovernmentDepartment of Premier and Cabinet, State Government of Victoria
KeywordsMental healthPsychologyPsychiatrySocial psychologySociologyGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Gender affirmation is known to improve mental health among trans adults, but its impact on young people has been questioned. This study examined the mental health outcomes associated with social, medical, and legal gender affirmation among trans young people in Australia.Methods Data from 1697 trans young people aged 14–21 who participated in an Australian national survey were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analyses. We measured associations between gender affirmation and various mental health variables, including levels of happiness, psychological distress, anxiety, self-harm and recent suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Associations between gender affirmation and young people’s wellbeing, including experiences of verbal harassment, homelessness, and drug use were also examined.Results Participants who had affirmed their gender legally and medically (via hormone therapy or surgery/ies) reported lower levels of anxiety and psychological distress, while legal gender affirmation was associated with lower suicidal ideation. Social affirmation was not directly associated with wellbeing outcomes but was linked to an increased likelihood of verbal harassment and homelessness. All forms of gender affirmation were associated with increased drug use, which likely reflects the greater opportunities for social connection and LGBTQ-community involvement that trans young people experience when they take steps to affirm their gender.Conclusion All forms of gender affirmation were positively associated with the wellbeing of trans young people. Though young people who had socially affirmed their gender faced higher likelihoods of experiencing verbal harassment and homelessness, this is likely linked to their increased visibility and subsequent vulnerability to discrimination. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to address transphobia and discrimination. A comprehensive approach to supporting the wellbeing of trans young people should include legal, medical, and social affirmation, as well as addressing potential negative outcomes via societal education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Transgender HealthSame topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyFrench-language works237,207