Penser et pratiquer l’esprit du lieu / Reflecting on and Practicing the Spirit of Place
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sous la direction de / Edited by Célia Forget Préface / Preface Marie-Josée Deschênes Les textes recueillis dans cet ouvrage proposent une réflexion sur les manières de penser et de pratiquer l’esprit du lieu à travers le monde et au regard de différents champs disciplinaires. Nous menant sur les routes du Népal, du Pérou, du Liban, de l’Allemagne et d’ailleurs, sur les voies de l’archéologie, de l’histoire, de l’architecture et autres champs du patrimoine culturel, cet ouvrage offre un éclairage nouveau sur les différentes interprétations de l’esprit du lieu, sur les mesures architecturales qui peuvent autant lui réussir que lui nuire, sur les menaces qui l’affectent et sur les manières de le transmettre quand celui-ci n’a pas ou plus de support matériel. Découlant du premier forum international des jeunes chercheurs et professionnels en patrimoine culturel qui s’est tenu à Québec les 27 et 28 septembre 2008, lors de la tenue de la 16e Assemblée Générale d’ICOMOS, ce livre regroupe une sélection des meilleurs textes soumis par les participants. Les auteurs ont eu la possibilité de (re)penser l’esprit du lieu à la lumière des échanges interdisciplinaires qui ont fait le succès de ce forum. Les idées novatrices et constructives que renferment leurs textes révèlent leur intérêt et surtout leurs aptitudes à construire le patrimoine culturel de demain. The texts brought together in this volume offer reflection on the ways to think about and practice the spirit of place throughout the world and taking into account the various scholarly disciplines. Guiding our path through Nepal, Peru, Lebanon, Germany and elsewhere, over trails blazed by archaeology, history, architecture and other cultural heritage spheres, the book sheds new light on the varied interpretations of the spirit of place, the architectural activities able to both enhance it and do it damage, the factors which threaten it and the means for passing it on at those times when its material support is non-existent or exhausted. Fruit of the first International Forum of Young Researchers and Professionals in Cultural Heritage, held in Québec City September 27 and 28, 2008 on the site of the 16th ICOMOS General Assembly, the work presents a selection of the best texts submitted by participants. This book provided an opportunity for authors to (re)think the spirit of place in light of their discussions carried on across disciplines during the forum for the mutual benefit of all concerned. The innovative and constructive thinking shared in these documents highlights the commitment of those involved and likewise their competence for framing the cultural heritage of the future. Sous la direction de Célia Forget, cet ouvrage est préfacé par Marie-Josée Deschênes et comprend les contributions de / Edited by Célia Forget, this book owes its preface to Marie-Josée Deschênes. The articles therein represent contributions by : Imran Bin Tajudeen, Mazen Haidar, Rowena Butland, Ilan Vit-Suzan, Julien Bastoen, Mette Bye, Dagmara Zawadzka, Alexandra Georgescu Paquin, Ruprama Rai, Anila Naeem, Julie Alary Lavallée, Michelle L. Stefano, Kate Pierce-McManamon, Hui-Wen Lin, Jennifer Craig, Richard Desnoilles et / and Jean-Daniel Deschênes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".