MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399828426 · doi:10.32920/26052538

The Effects of Microplastics on Floc Formation, Nutrient Removal and Settleability in Wastewater Treatment

2024· preprint· en· W4399828426 on OpenAlexaff
Ricardo Primerano

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroplasticsWastewaterNutrientEnvironmental scienceSewage treatmentChemistryEnvironmental engineeringWaste managementEnvironmental chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microplastics (MPs) are ubiquitous anthropogenic pollutants and contaminants of concern that are being manufactured as plastic materials are relied upon in daily life, including packaging, cosmetics and other production sectors. One of the ways that MPs enter the environment is via wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). This study attempts to shed light on the potential interactions of these pollutants with microorganisms and some of the processes they facilitate in WWTPs by finding the effects of polyethylene (PE) MPs on the growth of wastewater (WW) microorganisms, nutrient removal (with a focus on nitrogen compounds), settleability of total suspended solids (TSS), and on the immediate and short-term floc formation. The two highest concentrations of PE MPs enhanced growth over an approximately 3-day period. Then, the absorbance values decreased, possible due to the formation of biofilms causing a decrease in planktonic cells. The high concentrations of PE MPs are seen to slow growth compared to the lower concentrations of MPs. PE MPs had a positive effect on nitrite oxidation but little to no effect on nitrification as a whole. Over the short term (1 to 7 days), MPs had little to no effect on floc size. Beyond 7 days, PE MPs had a positive effect on floc size. TSS was higher in reactors amended with MPs (528.9 mg/L) in comparison to the TSS values in the control reactors (212.2 mg/L) without MPs. The results indicate that MPs serve as nuclei for floc formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution→French-language works237,207→