1,2-trans-Diaminocyclohexane (DACH) in Asymmetric Catalysis: Nearing Fifty Years of Faithful Service and Counting
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This review highlights the use of DACH as a versatile ligand in catalytic asymmetric transformations providing mechanistic rationales and relevant comments presented in chronological order for each of the 21 reaction types with references up to December 25, 2023. Intended to be as practically comprehensive as possible, this review assembles useful examples of using DACH as a ligand in organocatalytic or as metal complexes in asymmetric transformations. The resulting enantiomerically enriched, if not pure, chiral non-racemic small molecules are of great utility as value added intermediates in the total synthesis of natural products, in the design and synthesis of medicinally important compounds, and in other areas in organic and bioorganic chemistry where chirality plays a role. The graphic image depicts Spartacus with his arms folded in the same sense of chirality as (R,R)-DACH. 1 Introduction 2 DACH: A Brief Historical Narrative 3 Catalytic Asymmetric Hydrogenation of Alkenes 4 Catalytic Asymmetric Dihydroxylation of Alkenes 5 Catalytic Asymmetric Sulfoxidation and Sulfimidation 6 Catalytic Asymmetric 1,4-Conjugate Addition 6.1 Using Jacobsen’s DACH Metal–salen Complexes as Catalysts 6.2 Using Takemoto’s Bifunctional H-Bonding DACH Thiourea Organocatalyst 6.3 Using DACH Ni(II) Complexes as Catalysts 6.4 Using DACH H-Bonding Catalysis 7 Catalytic Asymmetric Epoxidation of Alkenes 8 Catalytic Asymmetric Claisen Rearrangement 9 Catalytic Asymmetric 1,2-Nucleophilic Addition to Carbonyl Compounds 9.1 Catalytic Asymmetric Addition of Dialkylzinc to Aldehydes and Ketones 9.2 Catalytic Asymmetric Alkynylation of Aldehydes and Ketones 9.3 Catalytic Asymmetric Addition of Cyanide to Aldehydes and Ketones 10 Catalytic Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation 11 Catalytic Asymmetric Cyclopropanation of Alkenes 12 Catalytic Asymmetric Cycloaddition Reactions 13 Catalytic Asymmetric Aziridination of Alkenes 14 Catalytic Asymmetric Hydrogenation of Prochiral Ketones and Imines 15 Catalytic Asymmetric Aldol Reactions 16 Catalytic Asymmetric Opening of Small Ring Systems 16.1 Desymmetrization of meso-Epoxides and meso-Aziridines 16.2 Kinetic Resolution of Racemic Epoxides 16.3 Enantioselective Addition of CO2 to Epoxides 16.4 Enantioselective Ring Opening of Oxetanes 17 Catalytic Asymmetric Strecker Reactions 18 Catalytic Asymmetric Mannich Reactions 19 Catalytic Asymmetric Henry and Aza-Henry Reactions 20 Catalytic Asymmetric Morita–Baylis–Hillman and Rauhut–Currier Reactions 21 Catalytic Asymmetric Petasis Reactions 22 Organocatalytic Asymmetric Cascade Reactions 23 Miscellaneous Catalytic Reactions 24 Conclusion and Outlook 25 DACH Catalysts and Ligands List
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it