Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Écologistes et biogéographes, les rédacteurs, Serge Payette et Louise Filion, professeurs titulaires à l'Université Laval de Québec, ont réuni en 26 chapitres, des textes écrits par 46 auteurs, tous reconnus pour leur grande expertise dans le domaine de la dendroécologie. Ce volume rassemble des connaissances, des données souvent inédites et des exemples qui permettront aux lecteurs de découvrir et d'apprécier les plantes ligneuses qui, par la simple formation de bois et de cernes annuels de croissance, se transforment en véritables archives environnementales. Il constitue une référence pour les chercheurs, les professionnels de l'environnement, les étudiants de tous les cycles universitaires et le public averti qui s'intéressent aux arbres et aux arbustes. Avec la collaboration de : Alexis Achim, Dominique Arsenault, Jean Beaulieu, Christian Bégin, Yves Bégin, Yves Bergeron, Vincent Bernard, André Billamboz, Gretel Boswijk, Étienne Boucher, Stéphane Boudreau, Jean Bouquet, Danielle Charron, Alain Cloutier, Conrad Cloutier, Edward R. Cook, Luc Cournoyer, Rosanne D. D'arrigo, Ann Delwaide, Annie Deslauriers, Jean-Louis Edouard, Matti Eronen, Holger Gärtner, Joël Guiot, Ingo Heinrich, Samuli Helama, Yves Jardon, Cornelia Krause, Dominique Marguerie, Joëlle Marion, Jeanne Millet, Hubert Morin, Antoine Nicault, Jonathan G. Palmer, Michel Parent, Fidel A. Roig, Sergio Rossi, Martine M. Savard, Sonia Simard, David Stahle, Jean-Frédéric Terral, Lucien Tessier, Mauri Timonen, Ricardo Villalba.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.074 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it