MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399849584 · doi:10.1109/mdat.2024.3386106

Interview With Janusz Rajski

2024· article· pl· W4399849584 on OpenAlexaff
Nicola Nicolici

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Design and Test · 2024
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolish Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nicola Nicolici: Good evening and I would like to welcome Janusz Rajski, a Life Fellow of IEEE, who received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from Poznan textasciiacute University of Technology, Poland, in 1982. He is currently the vice president of engineering at Siemens Tessent Wilsonville, Wilsonville, OR, USA. During his tenure at Siemens, he has built a strong international research and development organization with a focus on innovative DFT technologies. His team has developed several revolutionary products widely adopted by the semiconductor industry: TestKompress, cell-aware test, and streaming scan networks. He has published 300 IEEE research papers and is a co-inventor of 130 U.S. and international patents. His papers won prestigious awards, including two best paper awards published in IEEE Transactions on CAD, one on logic synthesis and another on test compression. In 2009, Janusz received the Stephen Swerling Innovation Award from Mentor Graphics for his breakthrough innovation TestKompress and revitalizing Mentor’s DFT business to its current position as the number one test business in EDA. In 2018, he received the Siemens Inventor of the Year Lifetime Achievement Award for his extensive contributions to DFT. In 2023, he received the prestigious Bob Madge Innovation Award. Welcome, Janusz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Design and TestSame topicPolish Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207