MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399853824 · doi:10.26685/urncst.603

The Influence of Sex Hormones on Osteoarthritis Pain Perception in Mice

2024· article· en· W4399853824 on OpenAlexaff
Dhara Parsania, Arnica Khaton, S. Chander

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisHormonePain perceptionPerceptionPsychologyMedicineInternal medicineNeurosciencePhysical therapyAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Despite the higher prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) in women, animal studies are primarily performed in young male mice. There is evidence that cartilage degeneration is more severe in male mice which can be explained by the protective effect of estrogen against OA in females. This aligns with the onset of OA often occurring after menopause in women. This proposed study will assess the potential limitations of using male mice by evaluating the differences in OA pain perception between male and female mouse models, and the role of sex hormones. Methods: A total of 96 mice will be used, split into four groups (n = 12) within their sex: sham, sham + ovariectomized (OVX)/orchiectomized (ORX), destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM), and DMM + OVX/ORX. Half of the female (n = 24) and male mice (n = 24) will then receive DMM surgery to induce post-traumatic OA. Electronic von Frey (EvF) will be used to measure mechanical allodynia and Pressure Application Measurement (PAM) will assess knee hyperalgesia. Open field testing (OFT) will evaluate locomotor and behavioural activity. Twelve weeks after DMM, all mice will be sacrificed, and knee histological sections will be taken to assess for OA damage using the OARSI and synovial scoring system. Anticipated Results: Higher overall measures of pain, indicated by EvF, knee hyperalgesia, OFT and synovium analysis, are anticipated in intact female mice than in intact male mice. ORX mice will likely experience more allodynia/hyperalgesia than intact male mice and OVX mice will likely experience less allodynia/hyperalesia than intact female mice. Intact DMM female mice will have increased effusion-synovitis at a worse grade than intact DMM male mice. ORX males will experience less severe OA than intact male mice and OVX females will experience more severe OA than intact female mice. Discussion: Anticipated differences between the pain response between male and female mice show that the use of exclusively male mice is a limitation in OA-associated pain research. Conclusion: This novel study considers the role of sex hormones on the pain perception of OA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicHormonal and reproductive studiesFrench-language works237,207