MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399854590 · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1805

Current Management of Desmoid Tumors

2024· review· en· W4399854590 on OpenAlexaff
Bernd Kasper, Elizabeth H. Baldini, Sylvie Bonvalot, Dario Callegaro, Kenneth Cardona, Chiara Colombo, Nadège Corradini, Aimeé M. Crago, Angelo Paolo Dei Tos, Palma Dileo, Eldad Elnekave, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Fariba Navid, Jeffrey M. Farma, Andrea Ferrari, Marco Fiore, Rebecca A. Gladdy, Mrinal M. Gounder, Rick L. Haas, Olga Husson, Jean‐Emmanuel Kurtz, Alex J. Lazar, Daniel Orbach, Nicolas Penel, R. Ratan, Chandrajit P. Raut, Christina L. Roland, Ann-Rose W. Schut, Monika Sparber‐Sauer, D. Strauß, Winette T.A. van der Graaf, Marco Vitellaro, Aaron R. Weiss, Alessandro Gronchi, Benjamin A. Alman, Steven Attia, Jyoti Bajpai, Giacomo Giulio Baldi, Livia Prudente Barbieri, Christina Baumgarten, Charlotte Benson, Jean‐Yves Blay, Kjetil Boye, Bernadette Brennan, Andre Domenico Campanacci, Paolo G. Casali, Michela Casanova, Tom Wie-Wu Chen, Lorenzo D’Ambrosio, Chaves Maria Carolina De Menezes, Armelle Dufresne, Hans Roland Dürr, Anna Maria Frezza, David Gyorki, Sam Hackett, Florian Haller, Audrey Hélaine, Peter Hohenberger, Toni Ibrahim, Shintaro Iwata, Robin L. Jones, Akira Kawai, Mohamed Kelany, David G. Kirsch, Andreas Leithner, Andrea J. MacNeill, Christina Messiou, Robert G. Maki, Carlo Morosi, Andrea Napolitano, Yoshihiro Nishida, Elena Palassini, Shreyaskumar Patel, Giulia Personeni, Raphael E. Pollock, Emanuele Rausa, Evelyne Roets, Enrica Rossi, Piotr Rutkowski, D. Salvatore, Claudia Sangalli, Marta Sbaraglia, Philip Michael Smith, Silvia Stacchiotti, William D. Tap, Gabriel Tinoco, Dimitri Tzanis, Michiel A. J. van de Sande, Kim van der Zande, Winan J. van Houdt, Cornelis Verhoef, Andrew J. Wagner, Eva Wardelmann, Jeanne Whiting

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Oncology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSoft tissue tumor case studies
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGuidelineMEDLINERandomized controlled trialEvidence-based medicineCryotherapyRadiation therapyClinical trialSarcomaSurgeryPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Desmoid tumor (DT) is a rare and locally aggressive monoclonal, fibroblastic proliferation characterized by a variable and often unpredictable clinical course. Previously, surgery was the standard primary treatment modality; however, within the past decade, a paradigm shift toward less-invasive management has been introduced and an effort to harmonize the strategy among clinicians has been made. To update the 2020 global evidence-based consensus guideline on the management of patients with DT, the Desmoid Tumor Working Group convened a 1-day consensus meeting in Milan, Italy, on June 30, 2023, under the auspices of the European Reference Network on Rare Adult Solid Cancers and Sarcoma Patient Advocacy Global Network, the Desmoid Foundation Italy, and the Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation. The meeting brought together over 90 adult and pediatric sarcoma experts from different disciplines as well as patients and patient advocates from around the world. Observations: The 2023 update of the global evidence-based consensus guideline focused on the positioning of local therapies alongside surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment algorithm as well as the positioning of the newest class of medical agents, such as γ-secretase inhibitors. Literature searches of MEDLINE and Embase databases were performed for English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of systemic therapies to obtain data to support the consensus recommendations. Of the 18 full-text articles retrieved, only 4 articles met the inclusion criteria. The 2023 consensus guideline is informed by a number of new aspects, including data for local ablative therapies such as cryotherapy; other indications for surgery; and the γ-secretase inhibitor nirogacestat, the first representative of the newest class of medical agents and first approved drug for DT. Management of DT is complex and should be carried out exclusively in designated DT referral centers equipped with a multidisciplinary tumor board. Selection of the appropriate strategy should consider DT-related symptoms, associated risks, tumor location, disease morbidities, available treatment options, and preferences of individual patients. Conclusions and Relevance: The therapeutic armamentarium of DT therapy is continually expanding. It is imperative to carefully select the management strategy for each patient with DT to optimize tumor control and enhance quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA OncologySame topicSoft tissue tumor case studiesFrench-language works237,207