MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399855352 · doi:10.4103/jopsys.jopsys_2_24

Mental Disability in Schizophrenia and its Psychopathological Correlates: A Hospital-Based Cross-sectional Study

2024· article· en· W4399855352 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Harshitha V. Handral, Madhusudhan Shivappa, Yamasandhi Mallegowda Jeevan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychiatry Spectrum · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCross-sectional studyPsychopathologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychologyPsychiatryClinical psychologySchizophrenia spectrumMedicinePsychosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Schizophrenia is a chronic mental disorder with a relapsing course with generally incomplete remissions and functional decline with varying positive and negative symptoms along with cognitive impairments. Despite the widespread availability of medications to suppress psychosis and prevent relapse, schizophrenia patients continue to remain disabled in different functional aspects in the community. Disability can hence be termed as one of the consequences of schizophrenia. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of mental disability among patients with schizophrenia and to evaluate the association between clinical features and disabilities among them. Methods: Fifty-three patients who came to psychiatry outpatients in a government tertiary health care hospital who fulfill diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia with at least 2 years of duration of illness and have been on pharmacotherapy for at least 8 weeks before the day of assessment were considered into the study after obtaining an informed consent. The Mini-international neuropsychiatric interview screening for psychiatric diagnosis was applied. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale was applied to know the illness severity of schizophrenia. The Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale is applied to all to assess the disability among the participants. The Clinician Rating Scale is applied to determine the treatment compliance with psychiatric medications. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) was applied to all participants to assess their cognitive functioning. Results: Mild disability was more prevalent followed by moderate and severe disability. The percentage of disability was found to be positively correlated with negative ( r = 0.73) and general psychopathology symptoms ( r = 0.67) than with positive symptoms ( r = 0.39) and was found to be negatively correlated with total MoCA scores ( r = −0.5). All these associations were significant. Conclusions: Disability is found to increase with increase in positive, negative, and general psychopathology symptoms and declining cognitive function. Out of all the symptoms, the negative symptoms are found to strongly influence the severity of disability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.667

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychiatry SpectrumSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207