MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399868800 · doi:10.1111/add.16564

Changes in prenatal cannabis‐related diagnosed disorders after the Cannabis Act and the COVID‐19 pandemic in Quebec, Canada

2024· article· en· W4399868800 on OpenAlexafffundabout
José Ignacio Nazif‐Muñoz, Pablo Martínez, Christophe Huỳnh, Victoria Massamba, Isaora Zefania, Louis Rochette, Helen‐Maria Vasiliadis

Bibliographic record

VenueAddiction · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecMcGill UniversityHôpital Charles-Le MoyneCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersInstitut Universitaire sur les DépendancesFonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture
KeywordsCannabisPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakPsychiatryMedicineMarijuana smokingSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Substance useVirologyPolysubstance dependenceInternal medicineOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Public health concerns regarding pregnant women's health after the enactment of the Cannabis Act in Canada (CAC) (a law that allowed non-medical cannabis use), and the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, call for a contemporary assessment of these two events. Our study measured associations between the CAC, the COVID-19 pandemic and the monthly prevalence rates of cannabis-, all drug- and alcohol-related diagnosed disorders among pregnant women in the province of Quebec. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a quasi-experimental design applying an interrupted time-series methodology in the province of Quebec, Canada. The participants were pregnant women aged 15-49 years, between January 2010 and July 2022. MEASUREMENTS: Administrative health data from the Québec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System were used to classify pregnant women according to cannabis-, all drug (excluding cannabis)- and alcohol-related disorders. The CAC (October 2018) and the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020) were evaluated as (1) slope changes and (2) level changes. Cannabis-, all drug (excluding cannabis)- and alcohol-related disorders were measured by total monthly age-standardized monthly prevalence rate of each disorder for pregnant women aged 15-49 years. FINDINGS: Before the CAC, the prevalence rate of cannabis-related diagnosed disorders significantly increased each month by 0.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.3-0.6] in the pregnant population. After the CAC, there were significant increases of 24% (95% CI = 1-53) of cannabis-related diagnosed disorders. No significant changes were observed for all drug (excluding cannabis)- and alcohol-related diagnosed disorders associated with the CAC. A non-significant decrease of 20% (95% CI = -38 to 3) was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic in alcohol-related disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The monthly incidence rates of diagnosed cannabis-related disorders in pregnant women in Quebec increased significantly following the enactment of the Cannabis Act in Canada. Diagnoses of all drug (excluding cannabis)- and alcohol-related disorders remained relatively stable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAddictionSame topicCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchFrench-language works237,207