MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399874094 · doi:10.1215/10642684-11177966

Introduction

2024· article· en· W4399874094 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chandan Reddy, C. Riley Snorton

Bibliographic record

VenueGLQ A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Q2, or “Q Squared,” features interviews, roundtables, short essays, and other accessible formats that highlight how queer and trans thinkers and LGBTQ histories engage and reframe contemporary social and political issues and processes, especially those that define national and global public squares.In light of the US Supreme Court's Dobbs decision, which rescinded a “fundamental right” to abortion in the United States, the inaugural Q2 in GLQ 30:1 explored the suppressed queer and trans perspectives on and entanglements of “reproductive justice,” traced by Black feminist abolition, Indigenous anticolonial critique, and transgender history. In this installment of Q2, we explore queer of color critique in a moment of danger. Like attacks on critical race theory, intersectionality, and ethnic studies, queer of color critique has become a target, especially for US right-wing forces in their bid to reclaim the state for fascism. These attacks on queer of color critique seek to limit its scope, delegitimate its knowledges, and suppress its dynamic social force through the targeting of educational spaces. Our dossier opens with a roundtable by Roderick Ferguson, Kara Keeling, Martin Manalansan, and Gayatri Gopinath, discussing the political and intellectual genealogies of queer of color critique, the questions that initiated its formation in their work, and most especially its defining commitment to and refashioning of a “politics of solidarity.” The dossier closes with a short essay by Juana María Rodríquez, who furthers the queer of color engagement with solidarity by discussing how defending women and femmes’ “rights” to sex work is at the very heart of what matters to, or ought to matter to, queer studies today.The roundtable discussion is an edited transcript of a conference panel titled “Queer of Color Critique: Spreading the Sunshine,” which took place on November 4, 2023, at the annual meeting of the American Studies Association in Montreal, Quebec. Proposed by Martin Manalansan, the panel was a cheeky response to Florida Governor Ron DeSantis's administration's nationalized attack on particular scholars of Black studies, such as Angela Davis, Kimberly Crenshaw, Cathy Cohen, and Roderick Ferguson, leading thinkers of Black radicalism, intersectionality, Black queer studies, and queer of color critique. For the purposes of Q2, we threaded together the recorded remarks of Ferguson, Keeling, Gopinath, Manalansan, and Reddy into a conversational format, while sharing Juana's remarks in the form of a short essay. In the time since we proposed the session for the ASA conference in January 2023, efforts to destroy the contradictory anti-racist, feminist, queer, and trans horizons of struggle present within liberal and nationalist educational and academic institutions that defined the attacks on queer of color critique became focused most pointedly on intellectual, activist, and scholarly critiques of Israeli settler-colonial violence, and especially on preventing the dissemination of Palestinian visions of justice and liberation after the commencement of the US-backed Israeli siege of Gaza in October 2023.At this “present moment of danger,” to borrow Walter Benjamin's phrase, with state assaults on ethnic studies knowledges and university administrations across the United States and elsewhere that are actively chilling the speech of students, faculty, and staff, and suppressing our efforts to learn together about and join in solidarity with the struggle for Palestinian liberation, we offer this dossier on queer of color critique in an effort to preserve and vitalize the recalcitrant knowledges that are produced by and reproduce queer modes of solidarity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLQ A Journal of Lesbian and Gay StudiesSame topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyFrench-language works237,207