MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lévy arithmetic optimization for energy Management of Solar Wind Microgrid with multiple diesel generators for off-grid communities

2024· article· en· W4399879138 on OpenAlexaff
Sujoy Barua, Adel Merabet, Ahmed Al‐Durra, Tarek H. M. EL-Fouly, Ehab F. El‐Saadany

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Energy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridDiesel fuelWind powerRenewable energyGridEnergy managementDiesel generatorArithmeticComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceMathematicsAutomotive engineeringMathematical optimizationEnergy (signal processing)Electrical engineeringEngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an improved optimization algorithm for the energy management of a renewable energy solar/wind microgrid with multiple diesel generators applied to off-grid remote communities. The main objective aims to solve the economic emission dispatch problem with a price penalty factor to minimize the energy cost and the emission level. An enhanced metaheuristic optimization algorithm, Lévy arithmetic algorithm, is applied to improve the searchability for optimal solution compared to the conventional arithmetic algorithm. The Lévy arithmetic method is used for the management of the microgrid and compared to other metaheuristic optimization algorithms for the same application. Comparative analysis demonstrates good cost savings using the Lévy arithmetic algorithm, compared to other optimization algorithms such as the arithmetic algorithm, crow search algorithm, hybrid modified grey wolf algorithm, interior search algorithm, cuckoo search algorithm, particle swarm algorithm, colony algorithm, and genetic algorithm. • Proposed an energy management algorithm for the PV/Wind/Diesel Microgrid in off-grid remote communities. • Introduced an enhanced arithmetic optimization approach for addressing economic and emission dispatch. • Evaluated the optimization method's effectiveness and comparative study between the LAA and AOA. • Compared the optimized results of proposed method with other well-known optimization techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied EnergySame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207