MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399886522 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110621

Simulating Extensive Air Showers: Investigating the LDF for Electrons and Muons Using the AIRES System

2024· article· en· W4399886522 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rawaa Y. Taha, Itab F. Hussein

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectronNuclear physicsMuonPhysicsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extensive air showers (EAS), cascades of electromagnetic radiation and ionized particles produced when primary cosmic rays (CRs) interact with atmospheric nuclei, generate a plethora of secondary particles, including electrons, muons, alpha particles, X-rays, and neutrons.These phenomena, pivotal in the exploration of high-energy CR interactions, have prompted advancements in simulating the lateral distribution function (LDF) of secondary particles.Utilizing AIR-shower extended simulations (AIRES) software (version 19.04.10), this study presents simulations of EAS to elucidate the impact on the LDF at the high energy thresholds of 1016, 1018 and 1019 eV.The focus is on secondary muons and electrons, considering the influence of primary protons and iron nuclei across zenith angles of 0, 20, and 40.Through the application of an exponential function model, novel coefficients were derived, reflecting the variation of the LDF relative to the distance from the shower core.These coefficients are instrumental in astrophysics and particle physics, offering a nuanced understanding of CR interactions with earth's atmosphere.By delineating the spatial particle distribution during interactions, insights into the shower's lateral extent and configuration are gleaned, facilitating the deduction of the initiating CR's energy.Such knowledge is crucial for CR spectrum analysis.The investigation of electron and muon LDFs not only advances fundamental particle physics but also holds implications for space exploration, radiation protection, and other domains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207