A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis on early ornithischian evolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resolving the evolutionary relationships of early diverging (‘basal’) ornithischian dinosaurs is a challenging topic in palaeontology, with multiple competing hypotheses on the phylogenetic relationships of heterodontosaurids, ‘hypsilophodontids’, and other early-diverging forms. These hypotheses cannot be directly compared because they are derived from differently constructed datasets (i.e. distinct samples of taxa and characters). This study aims to address these issues by revising and combining the distinct datasets into a single analysis in order to create the most comprehensive dataset for the investigation of the phylogenetic relationships of early-diverging ornithischians. A diphyletic model of Dinosauria is supported, with silesaurs nesting as members of Ornithischia. Heterodontosauridae is resolved as a clade of non-genasaurian ornithischians, rejecting a potential relationship with Marginocephalia. ‘Hypsilophodontid’ taxa span the neornithischian and ornithopod stem, with Thescelosauridae as the sister taxon to Cerapoda. A more restricted Ornithopoda is composed of five main clades: Hypsilophodontidae, Rhabdodontomorpha, Elasmaria, Dryosauridae and Ankylopollexia. Hypsilophodontidae is a valid clade, reduced to two European Barremian taxa. Rhabdodontomorpha does not contain Muttaburrasaurus as originally proposed, but instead expands to include a North American clade formed by Convolosaurus, Iani and Tenontosaurus. Elasmaria contains all non-dryomorph Gondwanan ornithopods, with its members possessing multiple distinct body plans. New results and comparison with previous studies suggest that some members of Dryosauridae are not ‘true dryosaurids’ but various early euiguanodontians that may be more closely related to either Elasmaria or Ankylopollexia. Results group most ‘hypsilophodontids’ in larger clades, significantly reducing the number and extension of ghost lineages throughout all of Neornithischia. These clades also show a degree of endemism, with different lineages present at different continents in the Late Cretaceous. This new phylogenetic analysis unifying previous works will provide a framework for future studies on origins and relations of early diverging ornithischians, and attempting to find stability among the different competing hypotheses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".