Validity and Reliability of the GAITWell®: A Low-Cost Modular System for Gait Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Gait analysis systems offer invaluable insights for rehabilitation, yet their expense limits clinician access. We developed GAITWell®, a low-cost modular system for capturing spatiotemporal gait variables, and evaluated its measurement properties. Methods: The GAITWell® uses discreet binary sensors on interconnected boards to collect gait data, which is then analyzed using the DBSCAN algorithm on the Cartesian points from sensor outputs. Reliability was assessed using ICC2,1, standard error of the mean (SEM) and Bland-Altman plots. Validity was determined by comparing GAITWell® with the Qualisys Pro-Reflex system. Results: Participated 38 healthy adults, with an average age of 33.2 years (SD 13.0). Correlations between GAITWell® and the Qualisys system ranged from moderate to very high for most gait variables, with the exception of stride length, which demonstrated a low but significant correlation (r = .360, p < .05). The ICC2,1 indicated moderate to good agreement for most gait variables. Stance and double support times, cadence, and base of support exhibited poor reliability, characterized by larger SEM and limits of agreement. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the GAITWell® system is a promising tool for gait analysis. Future research will enhance sensor accuracy and refine algorithms to improve reliability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".