Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic predictive marker on adults with traumatic brain injury: Systematic review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has emerged as a prognostic predictive marker in various diseases, but its role in traumatic brain injury (TBI) has not been fully elucidated. This study aims to evaluate the role of PLR as a prognostic predictive marker in adults with TBI. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items in the Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Guidelines 2020. A comprehensive search was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, Library of Congress, and Jisc Library Hub Discover database to identify relevant studies published up to February 2023. Both prospective and retrospective observational studies written in English or Indonesian were included in the study. No restrictions were placed on the year and country of publication and duration of follow-up. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and the risk of bias was estimated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Research (Ro-BANS) tool. A narrative synthesis was also conducted to summarize the findings. Results: We retrieved 1644 references using the search strategy, and 1623 references were excluded based on screening the title and abstract. The full text was retrieved for 20 articles and subjected to the eligibility criteria, of which 16 were excluded from the study. Four papers with a total of 1.467 sample sizes were included in the review. The median of NOS for study quality was 8-9, with the risk of selection bias using the Ro-BANS tool being low in all studies except for the blinding outcome assessments, which are all unclear. The study finding suggests that the PLR has the potential as an independent prognostic predictive marker in adult patients with TBI. In three studies, a high level of admission PLR may independently predict an increasing mortality risk in 30 days and adverse outcomes measured by the Glasgow outcome scale in 6 months following TBI. However, one study shows that PLR may have limited value as a predictor of mortality or favorable neurological outcomes compared to other hematological parameters. Further studies were needed to establish the clinical utility of PLR and fill the present gaps. Conclusion: This systematic review provides evidence supporting the utilization of PLR as a prognostic predictive marker in adult patients with TBI. The PLR can mainly be utilized, especially in rural practice, as PLR is a simple, low-cost, and routinely performed hematological examination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.036 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".