Neurocognitive outcome post cranioplasty: The role of cerebral hemodynamics and cerebrospinal fluid dynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Cranioplasty has been useful in treating the symptoms associated with the "Sunken skin flap syndrome" post decompressive craniectomy, for which various mechanisms have been proposed. In this study, we aim to assess the changes in the cerebral blood flow and intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics post cranioplasty and correlate with the improvement in the neurocognitive status. Methods: Computed tomography perfusion and cine magnetic resonance imaging studies were done to study the changes in cerebral perfusion and CSF flow dynamics postcranioplasty. The cognitive status was assessed using Montreal cognitive assessment, mini-mental state examination, and frontal assessment battery scores in the preoperative period and at 1 and 6 months follow-up. Results: There was a significant change in cognitive status postcranioplasty, both at 1 and 6 months follow-up, which was associated with a significant improvement in cerebral blood flow, decreased mean transit time, and improvement in the mean and peak CSF flow velocities at the foramen of Magendie and aqueduct of Sylvius. Conclusion: Cranioplasty leads to a marked improvement in cerebral hemodynamics, which is more significant on the ipsilateral side. It also leads to increased CSF turnover and improved CSF circulation. Improved cerebral perfusion and, more importantly, CSF dynamics may be responsible for the demonstrable improvement in the neurocognition in the postcranioplasty period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".