MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399900038 · doi:10.18280/ria.380303

Harnessing ResUHybridNet with Federated Learning: A New Paradigm in Brain Tumour Segmentation

2024· article· en· W4399900038 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ayush Giri, Prashna Thapa, J. Saira Banu, Shashwat Poudyal, Baibhav Rijal, Siddhant Karki

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceNeurosciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Precise segmentation of brain tumors from MRI scans remains a formidable challenge, driven by the critical demand for accuracy in medical imaging.To surmount this challenge, our paper introduces the Federated ResUHybridNet-a cutting-edge methodology that harmonizes the resilience of ResNet with the precision of U-Net.Nestled within the sophisticated realm of federated learning, this innovative architecture fosters collaborative model training, optimizing the training process and steadfastly upholding stringent data privacy standards.The methodology employs a Federated learning framework for collaborative model training across multiple hospital nodes.It features the ResUHybridNet architecture, combining the deep feature learning of ResNet with the detailed segmentation capabilities of U-Net.This integration optimizes brain tumor segmentation by synergizing the strengths of both architectures.Furthermore, the decentralized ResUHybridNet model undergoes fine-tuning by leveraging the local data of each individual participating hospital.The study is dedicated to the segmentation of brain tumors using 3D MRI scans as the imaging modality.The dataset employed encompasses 3D volumetric data, enhancing the depth and spatial understanding crucial for the evaluation of the Federated ResUHybridNet architecture.Overall, the Federated ResUHybridNet model significantly advances data privacy measures through federated learning and achieves optimized model performance.These contributions mark a notable stride towards enhancing brain tumor diagnosis standards and refining subsequent treatment strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.826

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207