MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399910331 · doi:10.1016/j.gastha.2024.05.013

Safety and Tolerability of Microbial Inulinase Supplementation in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

2024· article· en· W4399910331 on OpenAlexafffund
Sean M. Garvey, Ashley LeMoire, Jun Wang, Lois Lin, B.M. Newaz Sharif, Anthony Bier, R. Boyd, Joshua Baisley

Bibliographic record

VenueGastro Hep Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsNutrasource
FundersHealth Canada
KeywordsTolerabilityPlaceboInulinaseRandomized controlled trialMedicineInternal medicineAdverse effectAlternative medicineFood scienceBiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims: Dietary fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) contribute to gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in individuals with FODMAP sensitivity and irritable bowel syndrome. Oral enzyme supplementation is a strategy to reduce dietary FODMAP exposure and limit FODMAP-associated GI distress. This clinical trial investigated the safety of dietary supplementation with a food-grade, microbial inulinase known to hydrolyze fructan-type or inulin-type FODMAPs and related fructo-oligosaccharides in vitro. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design trial was conducted in 60 healthy adult participants of both sexes. Following a 2-week run-in placebo phase, participants were randomized to consume inulinase or placebo capsules twice daily with meals for 4 weeks. The total daily dose of inulinase was 2000 inulinase activity units. Safety measures included blood clinical chemistry, hematology, lipid profile, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, insulin, lactate, and uric acid. GI symptoms were recorded weekly using the 15-item Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale. Results: Fifty-eight participants completed the study. There were no clinically meaningful between-group differences in blood biomarkers. During the 4-week intervention period, 5 (16.7%) of 30 participants reported 5 adverse events in the inulinase group, and 8 (26.7%) of 30 participants reported 13 adverse events in the placebo group. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in the change from baseline to 1, 2, 3, or 4 weeks of supplementation with respect to the 15-item Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale overall or domain scores. Conclusion: Microbial inulinase supplementation demonstrated a favorable safety profile in healthy adults. Further investigation in a dose-ranging study in individuals with dietary FODMAP, fructan, or inulin sensitivity or irritable bowel syndrome is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05744700.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastro Hep AdvancesSame topicMicrobial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207