MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399917518 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.190603

Uncertainty Analysis of Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves of Babylon City

2024· article· en· W4399917518 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thair Jabbar Mizhir AL-Fatlawi, Karrar Ghanim Hameed AL-Talebi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuration (music)Intensity (physics)Environmental sciencePhysicsAcousticsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A substantial subject for the hydrological cycle, engineers must be able to determine the amount of rainfall in order to design structures and dams that deal with collection, transport and storage runoff.The study provides information on the amount of rainfall (measured in millimeters) that occurred annually from 1991 to 2021 in a single meteorological station in Iraq, specifically Babylon.The distributions of observed frequency are described, and the study attempts to fit three theoretical distributions (Gamma, Log Normal, and Normal) to the data.The distributions and tests chosen for the study play crucial roles in statistical analysis.The Normal distribution, a fundamental pattern in statistics, helps identify common trends in data and is a key part of quality control processes.It is often taught early in statistical education due to its significance in understanding natural variations and environmental factors.The Gamma distribution is widely used in statistics to model time durations for tasks or events.The Log-Normal distribution describes a variable whose logarithm follows a normal distribution.Chi-square test is a statistical method to compare expected and observed outcomes across different categories, commonly employed in survey analysis.The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test compares distributions of two independent samples, useful for evaluating how well a theoretical distribution fits actual data.Researchers use this test under similar conditions as the Chi-square test.The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Chi-Square and Anderson-Darling indices where, the calculated value of nonparametric test (statistic value) is extract and compared with the tabular value (critical value) based on the significant () and degrees of freedom, if the calculated value is less than the tabular value, we accept the null hypothesis (good fit); otherwise, we do not accept the null hypothesis (poor fit).They are used to compare the theoretical distributions to the observed data.The study then focuses on the Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) curves for extreme rainfall values, with durations of 15, 30, and 60 minutes.The results reveal that rainfall intensity decreases as the duration of the storm increases.Additionally, rainfall of a specific duration shows higher intensity if the return period is greater.Gumbel's extreme value distribution, Normal distribution, and Log Normal distribution are used to fit rainfall data with 5, 10, 15, and 50-year return periods.The Excel Software showed that the lognormal, normal, and Gamma probability distributions were the best fit for the data group for all durations.The software estimated the intensities of precipitation for return periods of 5, 10, 15, and 50 years, and the Log Normal distribution presented as the good agreement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207