MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399919425 · doi:10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.1130

Comparative Effects of Cryostretching and Contract-Relax Technique on Knee Osteoarthritis

2024· article· en· W4399919425 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Muhammad Abbas, Haram Usman, Rabiya Tahir, Syeda Sana Zahra, Muhammad Hanif, Shaheer Masood

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Health and Rehabilitation Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a condition characterized by the degeneration of cartilage in the knee joint, leading to pain, stiffness, and reduced range of motion. Cryostretching has been suggested as a beneficial intervention for knee OA, combining cold application to reduce muscle spasm with stretching to elongate muscles. Similarly, the contract-relax technique, which uses isotonic muscle contraction followed by stretching, has been shown to improve muscle elasticity and ROM. Objective: To compare the effects of cryostretching and the contract-relax technique on pain, physical function, and ROM in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted on 30 knee OA patients from government hospitals in Faisalabad. Participants aged 40-60 years with grade 1 or 2 knee OA were recruited using purposive sampling. Subjects were randomly allocated to either the cryostretching group (Group A, n=15) or the contract-relax group (Group B, n=15). Interventions were administered twice a week for four weeks. Pain, physical function, and ROM were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and a goniometer, respectively. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25, with paired and independent sample t-tests used to compare within-group and between-group differences, respectively. Results: Significant improvements were observed in both groups. For Group A, the mean WOMAC score improved by 35.33 (95% CI: 28.78-41.88, p<0.001) at 4 weeks, while Group B showed an improvement of 24.13 (95% CI: 17.21-31.04, p<0.001). ROM in Group A increased by 8.20 (95% CI: 7.20-9.19, p<0.001) compared to 5.40 (95% CI: 4.61-6.18, p<0.001) in Group B. VAS scores decreased by 6.40 (95% CI: 5.65-7.14, p<0.001) in Group A and by 4.33 (95% CI: 3.76-4.90, p<0.001) in Group B. Between-group differences at 4 weeks were significant for all measures, favoring the cryostretching group. Conclusion: Cryostretching was more effective than the contract-relax technique in reducing pain, improving physical function, and increasing ROM in patients with knee osteoarthritis. These findings support the integration of cryostretching into clinical practice for managing knee OA. Keywords: Knee osteoarthritis, cryostretching, contract-relax technique, pain management, range of motion, physical function, rehabilitation therapy, cold therapy, muscle stretching, osteoarthritis treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.394 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Health and Rehabilitation ResearchSame topicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesFrench-language works237,207