MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399923682 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggae219

Utilizing Euler poles for the evaluation of plate rigidity in numerical mantle convection models

2024· article· en· W4399923682 on OpenAlexafffund
Joshua Guerrero, T T Ojo, Chad Fairservice, Pejvak Javaheri, J. P. Lowman

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsGeologyMantle convectionGeophysicsRigidity (electromagnetism)ConvectionMantle (geology)Euler's formulaMechanicsSeismologyMathematical analysisMathematicsPhysicsSubduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Evidence that the Earth’s surface is divided into a tessellation of piece-wise rigidly translating plates is the primary observation supporting the solid-state creep-enabled convection paradigm, utilized to investigate evolution of the Earth’s mantle. Accordingly, identifying the system properties that allow for obtaining dynamically generated plates remains a primary objective in numerical global mantle convection simulations. The first challenge for analysing fluid dynamic model output for the generation of rigid plates is to identify candidate plate boundaries. Here, we utilize a previously introduced numerical tool for plate boundary detection which uses a user specified threshold (tolerance) to automatically detect candidate plate boundaries. The numerical tool is applied with different sensitivities, to investigate the nature of the surface velocity fields generated in three calculations described in earlier work. The cases examined differ by the values that they specify for the model yield stress, a parameter that can allow the formation of tightly focussed bands of surface deformation. The three calculations we examine include zones comprising possible plate boundaries that are characterized by convergence, divergence and strike-slip behaviour. Importance of the potential plate boundaries is assessed by examining the rigidity of the inferred model generated plates. The rigidity is measured by comparing the model velocities to the rigid rotation velocities implied by the statistically determined Euler poles for each candidate plate. We quantify a lack in rigidity by calculating a deformity field based on disagreement of actual surface velocity with rotation about the Euler pole. For intermediate yield stress and boundary detection threshold value, we find that the majority of the model surface can translate almost rigidly about distinct plate Euler poles. Regions that conform poorly to large-scale region rigid translation are also obtained but we find that generally these regions can be decomposed into subsets of smaller plates with a lower tolerance value. Alternatively, these regions may represent diffuse boundary zones. To clarify the degree to which the mantle convection model behaviour shows analogues with Earth’s current-day surface motion, we apply the plate boundary detection and Euler pole calculation methods to previously published terrestrial strain-rate data. Strong parallels are found in the response of the terrestrial data and mantle convection calculations to the threshold value, such that appropriate choice of that parameter results in very good agreement between observations and convection model character. We conclude that plates generated by fluid dynamic convection models can exhibit motion that is markedly rigid, and define statistics (plateness) and fields (deformity) by which the generation of self-consistently determined plate rigidity can be quantified, as well as describing how plate recognition might be optimized. We also note that in agreement with the Earth’s current state, we obtain a dozen dominant plates in the case exhibiting the most plate-like (rigid) surface, suggesting that this approximate number of plates is perhaps intrinsic to the geometry, surface area and physical properties of Earth’s mantle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207