MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of COVID-19 on mild vascular cognitive impairment in patients with atrial fibrillation: results of a three-year observational study

2024· article· en· W4399923761 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vorob'eva Ov, Natalya N. Shindryaeva, V V Fateeva

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology neuropsychiatry Psychosomatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyAtrial fibrillationCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Cognitive impairmentMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineCognitionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)PsychiatryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relationship between vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) and atrial fibrillation (AF) is mediated by multiple mechanisms, including vascular risk factors associated with a more severe course of COVID-19. Objective: to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the dynamics of cognitive status parameters in patients with AF over an observation period of 36 months. Material and methods. The observational study included 51 patients (19 men and 32 women; age ranged from 46 to 73 years, mean age 57.7 years) who met the inclusion criteria. All study participants were tested at baseline and after 36 months using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The study took place during COVID-19 pandemic, and 25.5% of patients had documented SARS-CoV-2-associated pneumonia. During the observation period, patients received stable background therapy to prevent modifiable vascular risk factors. Two groups were formed: group 1 (n=13) — COVID-19 “+”, group 2 (n=38) — COVID-19 “-”. Patients in group 1 were more likely to have stage IIIarterialhyper-tension (46.2% vs. 17.9% in group 2; p<0.05), had a history of ischemic stroke (38.5% vs. 5.3% in group 2; p<0.05), were not vaccinated with Gam-COVID-Vac vaccine (23.1% vs. 73.7% in group 2; p<0.05). Results. Patients with AF after SARS-CoV-2 virus infection experienced deterioration of VCI from 22.7±2.1 to 20.2±1.6 points according to MoCA (p<0.05) due to impairments in executive functions, attention, memory and speech. After 36 months of observation, the number of patients with a memory index score <7 points, which indicates a high risk of conversion of mild cognitive impairment to dementia, increased by 30.7% in group 1 and by 5.3% in group 2 (p<0.05). Conclusion. Patients with atrial fibrillation who had COVID-19 showed a more pronounced progression of cognitive impairment despite the constant use of stable background therapy aimed at correcting modifiable vascular risk factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology neuropsychiatry PsychosomaticsSame topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19French-language works237,207