MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399938100 · doi:10.2196/59119

The Evaluation of a Web-Based Intervention (Deprexis) to Decrease Depression and Restore Functioning in Veterans: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

2024· article· en· W4399938100 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rahel Pearson, Christopher G. Beevers, Joseph Mignogna, Justin K. Benzer, P. Pfeiffer, Edward P. Post, Suzannah K. Creech

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDigital Mental Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsPsychological interventionPsychosocialRandomized controlled trialMedicineIntervention (counseling)Depression (economics)Depressive symptomsClinical trialPsychiatryClinical psychologyPhysical therapyAnxietySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms are common in veterans, and the presence of these symptoms increases disability as well as suicidal thoughts and behaviors. However, there is evidence that these symptoms often go untreated. Intervening before symptoms become severe and entrenched is related to better long-term outcomes, including improved functioning and less disease chronicity. Computer-delivered interventions may be especially appropriate for those veterans with mild to moderate depressive symptoms, because these interventions can require fewer resources and have lower barriers to access and thus have potential for wider reach. Despite this potential, there is a dearth of research examining computerized interventions for depressive symptoms in veteran samples. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Deprexis (GAIA AG), a computerized intervention for depressive symptoms and related functional impairment. METHODS: Veterans will be recruited through the US Department of Veterans Affairs electronic medical record and through primary care and specialty clinics. First, qualitative interviews will be completed with a small subset of veterans (n=16-20) to assess the acceptability of treatment procedures. Next, veterans (n=132) with mild to moderate depressive symptoms will be randomly assigned to the fully automated Deprexis intervention or a treatment-as-usual control group. The primary outcomes will be self-reported depressive symptoms and various dimensions of psychosocial functioning. RESULTS: This project was funded in May 2024, and data collection will be conducted between October 2024 and April 2029. Overall, 4 participants have been recruited as of the submission of the manuscript, and data analysis is expected in June 2029, with initial results expected in November 2029. CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide initial evidence for the efficacy of self-guided, computerized interventions for depressive symptoms and functional impairment in veterans. If effective, these types of interventions could improve veteran access to low-resource psychosocial treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06217198; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06217198. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/59119.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.006
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0730.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.296
GPT teacher head0.638
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research Protocols→Same topicDigital Mental Health Interventions→French-language works237,207→