Robust Constant Curvature Curve Communications With Complex and Quaternion Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of Digital Twin has recently emerged, which requires the transmission of a massive amount of sensor data with low latency and high reliability. Analog error correction is an attractive method for low-latency communications; hence, in this paper, we propose the use of complex-valued neural networks and Quaternionic Neural Networks (QNNs) to decode analog codes. Furthermore, we propose mapping our codes to the baseband of the frequency domain to enable easy time and frequency synchronization as well as to mitigate frequency-selective fading using robust estimation theory. This is accomplished by applying inverse Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) modulation, which achieves a significant reduction in hardware complexity, power, and cost as compared to our previously proposed analog coding scheme. Additionally, we introduce a scaled version of our previous analog codes that enables statistical signal processing, something we have not been able to achieve until now. This achieves significant noise immunity with drastic performance improvements at low Signal-to-Noise Ratios (SNR) and a small loss at high SNR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".