MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dynamic Energy-Aware Cloudlet-Based Mobile Cloud Computing Model for Green Computing

2024· article· en· W4399939794 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. William, Rahul Singh, Ahmed Saleh Al-Samalek, Ahmed Hussain, Arti Badhoutiya, A Kakoli Rao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloudletComputer scienceCloud computingMobile cloud computingGreen computingMobile computingDistributed computingUbiquitous computingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The usage of mobile cloud computing (MCC), which allows mobile users to access the benefits of cloud computing in a manner that is favourable to the environment, is an efficient strategy for addressing the present demands of the industrial sector. MCC is one of the acronyms for "mobile computing in the cloud." As a result of limitations imposed by wireless bandwidth and device capability, the installation of MCC has been met with a range of obstacles. These difficulties consist of, among other things, an increase in the amount of energy that is wasted and a delay in latency. To solve this issue, we have presented a dynamic cloudlet-based mobile cloud computing model (DECM), which makes use of dynamic cloudlets (DCL) to manage the additional energy that is necessary for wireless connections. As part of this investigation, we test our model by simulating an event that may take place in the actual world, and we also give data that can be relied upon for the evaluations. This research contributes significantly in two distinct ways. To begin, this study is the very first analysis of the most effective strategies for resolving concerns about energy loss within the framework of dynamic networking. It was carried out by a group of researchers from the United States and Canada. Second, the proposed model provides a path and theoretical foundations for more research to be conducted in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207