Evaluasi Sistem Pengelolaan Sampah Di Kampung Atas Air, Kelurahan Baru Tengah, Kecamatan Balikpapan Barat, Kota Balikpapan.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pengelolaan sampah di Kota Balikpapan, terutama di Kampung Atas Air, Kelurahan Baru Tengah, menghadapi tantangan dalam manajemen dan kesadaran masyarakat. Kampung ini adalah bagian dari kawasan permukiman kumuh dengan karakteristik rumah panggung dan mayoritas penduduknya nelayan. Penumpukan sampah yang belum tertangani dengan baik menjadi masalah utama, mengancam ekosistem pesisir dan kualitas lingkungan. Sistem pengelolaan yang tidak sesuai standar rumah layak huni juga berdampak negatif pada lingkungan, ekonomi, sosial, dan kesehatan masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi sistem pengelolaan sampah di Kampung Atas Air melalui aspek teknis operasional dan non teknis, termasuk pemilahan dan pewadahan, pengumpulan, pengangkutan, pemanfaatan, kelembagaan, peraturan, pembiayaan, dan peran masyarakat. Data dikumpulkan melalui survei primer dengan observasi secara langsung. Analisis dilakukan secara deskriptif komparatif untuk membandingkan kondisi eksisting dengan standar yang berlaku. Hasil penelitian akan menunjukkan adanya beberapa masalah dalam sistem pengelolaan sampah di Kampung Atas Air, terutama dalam pemilahan, pewadahan, dan kesadaran masyarakat. Evaluasi ini penting untuk mengidentifikasi aspek yang belum sesuai dengan standar, guna menekan timbulan sampah di kawasan tersebut.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".