ATLAS ITk Strip Sensor Quality Control and Review of ATLAS18 Pre-Production Sensor Results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the upgrade of the LHC to the High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC), the Inner Detector will be replaced with the new all-silicon ATLAS Inner Tracker (ITk) to maintain tracking performance in a high-occupancy environment and to cope with the increase in the integrated radiation dose.Comprising an active area of 165 m 2 , the outer four layers in the barrel and six disks in the endcap region will host strip modules, built with single-sided micro-strip sensors and glued-on hybrids carrying the front-end electronics necessary for readout.The strip sensors are manufactured as n + -in-p devices from high-resistivity silicon in 8 different shapes, from square in the barrel staves to a stereo annulus wedge-shape in the endcap discs, developed to withstand a total fluence of 1.6 × 10 15 n eq /cm 2 and a total ionising dose of 66 MRad.In 2020 the ITk Strip Sensors project has transitioned into the pre-production phase, where 5% of the production volume, a total of 1101 ATLAS18 wafers, was produced by Hamamatsu Photonics.Before being shipped out for module building, the ATLAS18 main sensors were tested at different institutes in the collaboration for mechanical and electrical compliance with technical specifications, the quality control (QC), while fabrication parameters were verified using test structures from the same wafers, the quality assurance (QA).The sensor QC evaluation program, test results and statistics, as well as experience gained from pre-production will be summarised in this contribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".