MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399993508 · doi:10.1016/s2665-9913(24)00167-x

Proof-of-concept studies in axial spondyloarthritis: there are no shortcuts

2024· article· en· W4399993508 on OpenAlexaff
Walter P. Maksymowych

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Rheumatology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnkylosing spondylitisPsoriatic arthritisCertolizumab pegolAxial spondyloarthritisRheumatoid arthritisArthritisTumor necrosis factor alphaInternal medicineAdalimumabSpondylitisImmunologyOncologySacroiliitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.406
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.511
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.4060.511
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0230.022
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.018
Scholarly communication0.0190.034
Open science0.0130.009
Research integrity0.0480.046
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet RheumatologySame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207