Resynthesizing Brassica napus with race specific resistance genes and race non-specific QTLs to multiple races of Plasmodiophora brassicae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clubroot disease in canola (Brassica napus) continues to spread across the Canadian prairies. Growing resistant cultivars is considered the most economical means of controlling the disease. However, sources of resistance to clubroot in B. napus are very limited. In this study, we conducted interspecific crosses using a B. rapa line (T19) carrying race-specific resistance genes and two B. oleracea lines, ECD11 and JL04, carrying race non-specific QTLs. Employing embryo rescue and conventional breeding methods, we successfully resynthesized a total of eight B. napus lines, with four derived from T19 × ECD11 and four from T19 × JL04. Additionally, four semi-resynthesized lines were developed through crosses with a canola line (DH16516). Testing for resistance to eight significant races of Plasmodiophora brassicae was conducted on seven resynthesized lines and four semi-resynthesized lines. All lines exhibited high resistance to the strains. Confirmation of the presence of clubroot resistance genes/QTLs was performed in the resynthesized lines using SNP markers linked to race-specific genes in T19 and race non-specific QTLs in ECD11. The developed B. napus germplasms containing clubroot resistance are highly valuable for the development of canola cultivars resistant to clubroot.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".