MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400030840 · doi:10.1101/2024.06.25.600562

The PIN1-p38-CtIP signaling axis protects stalled replication forks from deleterious degradation

2024· preprint· en· W4400030840 on OpenAlexaff
Francesca Vivalda, Marco Gatti, Letizia Manfredi, Hülya Doğan, Antônio Porro, Giulio Collotta, Ilaria Ceppi, Christine von Aesch, Vanessa van Ackeren, Sebastian Wild, Martin Steger, Begoña Cánovas, Monica Cubillos‐Rojas, Antoni Riéra, Petr Ćejka, Ángel R. Nebreda, Diego Dibitetto, Sven Rottenberg, Alessandro A. Sartori

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPIN1Replication (statistics)Cell biologyDegradation (telecommunications)BiologyVirologyComputer scienceGeneticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Human CtIP plays a critical role in homologous recombination (HR) by promoting the resection of DNA double-strand breaks. Moreover, CtIP maintains genome stability through protecting stalled replication forks from nucleolytic degradation. However, the upstream signaling mechanisms governing the molecular switch between these two CtIP-dependent processes remain largely elusive. Here, we show that phosphorylation of CtIP by the p38α stress kinase and subsequent PIN1-mediated CtIP cis -to- trans isomerization is required for fork stabilization but dispensable for HR. We found that stalled forks are degraded in cells expressing non-phosphorylatable CtIP or lacking PIN1-p38α activity, while expression of a CtIP trans -locked mutant overcomes the requirement for PIN1-p38α in fork protection. We further reveal that Brca1 -deficient mammary tumor cells that have acquired PARPi resistance regain chemosensitivity after PIN1 or p38α inhibition. Collectively, our findings identify the PIN1-p38-CtIP signaling pathway as a critical regulator of replication fork integrity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→