Repotrectinib in tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naïve patients (pts) with advanced <i>ROS1</i> fusion-positive (<i>ROS1+)</i> NSCLC in the phase 1/2 TRIDENT-1 trial: Clinical update, treatment beyond progression and subsequent therapies.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
8522 Background: Repotrectinib, a next-generation ROS1 TKI, has demonstrated durable clinical activity in the pivotal phase 1/2 TRIDENT-1 trial (NCT03093116). We report updated efficacy with a median follow-up of 33.9 months (mo) [~10 mo of additional follow-up], the first analyses of progression patterns, treatment beyond progression, and an update on subsequent anticancer therapies. Methods: Recommended phase 2 dose was 160 mg QD for 14 days, then 160 mg BID. Phase 2 primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (cORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial ORR (icORR), and safety. Treatment beyond BICR-assessed progression and sites of progression (per investigator) were also assessed. Safety assessments included all treated pts. Results: As of 15 Oct 2023, median follow-up in the TKI-naïve cohort (n = 71) was 33.9 (range, 24.0–76.5) months (mo). cORR was 79% (95% CI, 68–88); median DOR was 34.1 (95% CI, 27.4–not estimable [NE]) mo and 70% (95% CI, 57–83) of responders maintained a response of ≥ 24 mo. Median PFS was 35.7 (95% CI, 24.6–NE) mo and 63% (95% CI, 51–75) of pts were progression-free at 24 mo. Of 9 pts with measurable baseline brain metastases, icORR was 89% (95% CI, 52–100). Results for pts who received repotrectinib beyond progression are shown in the table. Of pts with disease progression per investigator (n = 37), the most common sites were lung (49%) and lymph nodes (35%). Of 42 (59%) pts who discontinued repotrectinib for any reason, 11 (26%) received single-agent TKI as the first subsequent anticancer therapy, 10 (24%) received chemo with/without immunotherapy (IO), and 2 (5%) received IO alone. Among all pts who received ≥ 1 dose of repotrectinib (n = 565), grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 323 (57%) pts and treatment-related adverse events in 162 (29%) pts. Treatment-emergent dizziness occurred in 63% of pts and was mostly grade 1-2. Conclusions: With a median follow-up of ~3 years in TRIDENT-1, repotrectinib continued to demonstrate durable clinical activity in ROS1 TKI-naïve pts. Progression patterns and treatment beyond progression were described for the first time. Clinical trial information: NCT03093116 . [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".