Improved Glowworm Swarm Optimization for Parkinson’s Disease Prediction Based on Radial Basis Functions Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease is caused by a disruption in the chemical products that enables the communication between brain cells. The brain’s dopamine cells are responsible for movement control, adaptability, and fluidity. Parkinson’s motor symptoms manifest when 60–80% of these cells are damaged due to insufficient dopamine. Researchers are working to find a way to identify the non-motor symptoms that manifest early detection in the disease to stop the disease’s progression because it is believed that the disease starts many years before the motor symptoms. This research presents Parkinson’s disease diagnosis based on deep learning. Processes for feature selection and classification encompass the suggested diagnosis technique. The proposed model searches for the best subset of characteristics using the Improved Glowworm Swarm Optimization (IGSO) algorithm. Radial Basis Functions Networks (RBFN) classifiers evaluate the chosen features. The suggested model is tested using datasets from Parkinson’s Handwriting samples and Parkinson’s Speech and voice with various sound recordings. With an accuracy of about 95.78%, the suggested algorithm forecasts Parkinson’s disease using the VoicePD dataset more precisely.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".