Improved Glowworm Swarm Optimization for Parkinson’s Disease Prediction Based on Radial Basis Functions Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease is caused by a disruption in the chemical products that enables the communication between brain cells. The brain’s dopamine cells are responsible for movement control, adaptability, and fluidity. Parkinson’s motor symptoms manifest when 60–80% of these cells are damaged due to insufficient dopamine. Researchers are working to find a way to identify the non-motor symptoms that manifest early detection in the disease to stop the disease’s progression because it is believed that the disease starts many years before the motor symptoms. This research presents Parkinson’s disease diagnosis based on deep learning. Processes for feature selection and classification encompass the suggested diagnosis technique. The proposed model searches for the best subset of characteristics using the Improved Glowworm Swarm Optimization (IGSO) algorithm. Radial Basis Functions Networks (RBFN) classifiers evaluate the chosen features. The suggested model is tested using datasets from Parkinson’s Handwriting samples and Parkinson’s Speech and voice with various sound recordings. With an accuracy of about 95.78%, the suggested algorithm forecasts Parkinson’s disease using the VoicePD dataset more precisely.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it