“Beyond the Catch: A Holistic Socioeconomic Evaluation of Aghanashini's Fishing Communities”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aghanashini river is one of the productive riverine systems of coastal Karnataka with reference to fishery resources which drains into Arabian Sea at Tadadi village of Uttara Kannada District. In order to understand educational back ground, fishery related lively hood and economic status of fishing communities residing across the Aghanashini estuary, a questionnaire was prepared to conduct the interview. Based on the interactions with 250 number of fishermen/women we came to know that total number of persons directly involved in collection of bivalves, clams, oysters etc. are around 600. On an average of 250 fishermen/women venture to harvest bivalves on daily basis particularly during low tide. On an average each person gets the fishes for 16 days in month, each person collects around 14kgs of bivalves in a day. Usually bivalves are sold Rs. 80/kg, October to May is the peak season for the fishery. Around 19 villages are directly involved in fishing which consists of 2398 fishers of which 1548 male and 850 female. Harikantra community is dominant followed by Gowdas, Ambigas, Gabits, Muslims, Patagar and Naik communities, literacy level of majority of these are uneducated, some have done matriculation and few passed secondary school. Fishing is the main source of livelihood to majority of the communities in this area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.041 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".