Human Diseases Associated with Notch Signalling: Lessons from Drosophila melanogaster
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drosophila melanogaster has been used as a model system to identify and characterize genetic contributions to development, homeostasis, and to investigate the molecular determinants of numerous human diseases. While there exist many differences at the genetic, structural, and molecular level, many signalling components and cellular machineries are conserved between Drosophila and humans. For this reason, Drosophila can and has been used extensively to model, and study human pathologies. The extensive genetic resources available make this model system a powerful one. Over the years, the sophisticated and rapidly expanding Drosophila genetic toolkit has provided valuable novel insights into the contribution of genetic components to human diseases. The activity of Notch signalling is crucial during development and conserved across the Metazoa and has been associated with many human diseases. Here we highlight examples of mechanisms involving Notch signalling that have been elucidated from modelling human diseases in Drosophila melanogaster that include neurodegenerative diseases, congenital diseases, several cancers, and cardiac disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it