Long-term outcomes of patients with toxic shock syndrome: A matched cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined long-term outcomes of toxic shock syndrome. METHODS: We conducted a matched cohort study of 630 patients with toxic shock syndrome and 5009 healthy controls between 2006 and 2021 in Quebec, Canada. Outcomes included hospitalization for renal, cardiovascular, hepatic, and other morbidity during 15 years of follow-up. We estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the risk of these outcomes over time, comparing patients with toxic shock syndrome relative to matched controls. RESULTS: Compared with healthy controls, rehospitalization rates at 15 years were higher for men with toxic shock syndrome (52.0 vs 30.0 per 100) but not for women (38.7 vs 45.6 per 100). In men, toxic shock syndrome was associated with an elevated risk of renal (HR 17.43, 95% CI 6.35-47.82), cardiovascular (HR 2.57; 95% CI 1.52-4.34), and hepatic hospitalization (HR 19.83, 95% CI 4.72-83.34). In women, toxic shock syndrome was associated with renal hospitalization (HR 4.71, 95% CI 1.94-11.45). Streptococcal toxic shock was associated with a greater risk of rehospitalization than staphylococcal toxic shock. CONCLUSIONS: Toxic shock syndrome is associated with rehospitalization up to 15 years later, especially in men. These patients may benefit from continued follow-up to prevent long-term morbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".