Structural basis for recruitment of peptidoglycan endopeptidase MepS by lipoprotein NlpI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peptidoglycan (PG) sacculi surround the cytoplasmic membrane, maintaining cell integrity by withstanding internal turgor pressure. During cell growth, PG endopeptidases cleave the crosslinks of the fully closed sacculi, allowing for the incorporation of new glycan strands and expansion of the peptidoglycan mesh. Outer-membrane-anchored NlpI associates with hydrolases and synthases near PG synthesis complexes, facilitating spatially close PG hydrolysis. Here, we present the structure of adaptor NlpI in complex with the endopeptidase MepS, revealing atomic details of how NlpI recruits multiple MepS molecules and subsequently influences PG expansion. NlpI binding elicits a disorder-to-order transition in the intrinsically disordered N-terminal of MepS, concomitantly promoting the dimerization of monomeric MepS. This results in the alignment of two asymmetric MepS dimers respectively located on the two opposite sides of the dimerization interface of NlpI, thus enhancing MepS activity in PG hydrolysis. Notably, the protein level of MepS is primarily modulated by the tail-specific protease Prc, which is known to interact with NlpI. The structure of the Prc-NlpI-MepS complex demonstrates that NlpI brings together MepS and Prc, leading to the efficient MepS degradation by Prc. Collectively, our results provide structural insights into the NlpI-enabled avidity effect of cellular endopeptidases and NlpI-directed MepS degradation by Prc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".