Structural basis for potent neutralization of human respirovirus type 3 by protective single-domain camelid antibodies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Respirovirus 3 is a leading cause of severe acute respiratory infections in vulnerable human populations. Entry into host cells is facilitated by the attachment glycoprotein and the fusion glycoprotein (F). Because of its crucial role, F represents an attractive therapeutic target. Here, we identify 13 F-directed heavy-chain-only antibody fragments that neutralize recombinant respirovirus 3. High-resolution cryo-EM structures of antibody fragments bound to the prefusion conformation of F reveal three distinct, previously uncharacterized epitopes. All three antibody fragments bind quaternary epitopes on F, suggesting mechanisms for neutralization that may include stabilization of the prefusion conformation. Studies in cotton rats demonstrate the prophylactic efficacy of these antibody fragments in reducing viral load in the lungs and nasal passages. These data highlight the potential of heavy-chain-only antibody fragments as effective interventions against respirovirus 3 infection and identify neutralizing epitopes that can be targeted for therapeutic development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".