The Influence of Solution-Focused Therapy on Quarter-Life Crisis in Early Adult Women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter-Life Crisis can defined as a period where someone feels uncertainty and confusion in their life. Early adult women are the group most frequently vulnerable to experiencing Quarter-Life Crisis because they often face pressures from social and personal responsibilities. Solution Focused Therapy is a therapeutic approach that focuses on finding solutions and is future-oriented. This study aims to fill the knowledge gap by investigating whether SFT therapy can reduce the symptoms of Quarter-Life Crisis in early adulthood women. This research uses a quasi-experimental one-group before and after study design. With two approaches, a quantitative approach using the Hassler questionnaire to measure the level of Quarter-Life Crisis and a qualitative approach using interviews and observations. Respondents consisted of 3 early adult women who experienced a quarter-life crisis. The results of the research prove that there is a difference before and after administering Solution Focused Therapy in the level of Quarter-Life Crisis of respondents, with a mean score in the pre-test of 120.67 and the post-test of 73.67. These results indicate that providing solution-focused therapy can significantly reduce the level of the quarter-life crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".