The Enterococcal Polysaccharide Antigen: from structure to biosynthesis and function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract L-Rhamnose-containing polysaccharides are produced by Streptococci and Enterococci. They define Lancefield serotypes and represent promising candidates for the design of glycoconjugate vaccines. The Enterococcal Polysaccharide Antigen produced by the opportunistic pathogen Enterococcus faecalis plays a critical role in normal growth, division, biofilm formation, antimicrobial resistance, phage susceptibility, and innate immune evasion. Despite the critical role of this polymer for E. faecalis physiology and host-pathogen interactions, little information is available on its structure and biosynthesis. Here, we elucidate the structure of the intact EPA produced by E. faecalis OG1RF. We report the structure of the linkage unit, revealing an unprecedented complexity of the rhamnose backbone and decorations. Finally, we explore the impact of several EPA structural modifications on innate immune evasion and recognition by bacteriophages. This work represents a first step towards the functional characterisation of EPA for the rational design of therapeutic strategies against a group of important pathogens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".