MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400102048 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeae142.110

Fibroblast activation following myocardial infarction and left ventricular remodelling

2024· article· en· W4400102048 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna Barton, Evangelos Tzolos, Neil Craig, Krithika Loganath, S Joshi, Alexander J. Fletcher, E Van Beek, Piotr J. Slomka, David E. Newby, Marc R. Dweck

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyocardial infarctionCardiologyInternal medicineVentricular remodelingMedicineElectrocardiography in myocardial infarctionFibroblastChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Novel molecular positron emission tomography (PET) assessments of fibrosis are now available but have not been compared directly to cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), the current reference standard for myocardial scar assessment. Using 68Gallium-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI), a radiotracer that binds to activated fibroblasts, we compared CMR and PET assessments of myocardial scar following ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Methods Hybrid 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/MR with gadolinium-based contrast agent was performed in 40 patients within 4 weeks of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (acute STEMI) with 19 returning at 12 weeks for repeat PET/MR (subacute STEMI). Scar burden (%LGE) was measured on late enhancement short axis CMR images (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging software, Canada). Volume and intensity of global myocardial 68Ga-FAPI uptake was quantified (QPET, Cedars Sinai, Los Angeles) to determine the volume myocardium with tracer uptake (%68Ga-FAPI) and intensity of PET signal (target-to-background ratio, TBRmax) after correcting for right atrial blood-pool activity. Results In acute STEMI, high intensity uptake of 68Ga-FAPI was observed localized to the infarct. The area of fibroblast activation greatly exceeded the area of scar detected by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (%68Ga-FAPI 26.6+-15.4% vs 14.5+-11.4%, p<0.001). 68Ga-FAPI volume and intensity declined between acute and subacute STEMI (%68Ga-FAPI 26.6+-15.4% vs 12.8+-8.1%, p<0.001, TBRmax 3.9+-1.1 vs 2.7+-0.7, p<0.001). By week 12, there was no difference between the area of fibroblast activation detected by 68Ga-FAPI uptake and area of scar detected by LGE (%68Ga-FAPI 12.8+-8.1% vs %LGE 10.3+-6.1%, ns). Conclusion Molecular PET assessments of myocardial scar formation provide different but complementary information to structural assessments of myocardial scar. Fibroblast activation following myocardial infarction is a dynamic process that can be non-invasively measured for the first time by 68Ga-FAPI PET.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular ImagingSame topicCardiac Structural Anomalies and RepairFrench-language works237,207