Extended Computed Tomography Angiography for the Successful Diagnosis of Cardioaortic Thrombus in Acute Ischemic Stroke and TIA: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac imaging is one of the main components of the etiological investigation of ischemic strokes. However, basic and advanced cardiac imaging remain underused in most stroke centers globally. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the supra-aortic and intracranial arteries is the most frequent imaging modality applied during the evaluation of patients with acute ischemic stroke to identify the presence of a large vessel occlusion. Recent evidence from retrospective observational studies has shown a high detection of cardiac thrombi, ranging from 6.6 to 17.4%, by extending a CTA a few cm below the carina to capture cardiac images. However, this approach has never been prospectively compared against usual care in a randomized controlled trial. The Extended Computed Tomography Angiography for the Successful Screening of Cardioaortic Thrombus in Acute Ischemic Stroke and TIA (DAYLIGHT) prospective, randomized, controlled trial evaluates whether an extended CTA (eCTA) + standard-of-care stroke workup results in higher detection rates of cardiac and aortic source of embolism compared to standard-of-care CTA (sCTA) + standard-of-care stroke workup. METHODS: DAYLIGHT is a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-blinded endpoint trial, aiming to recruit 830 patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) being assessed under acute code stroke at the emergency department or at a dedicated urgent stroke prevention clinic. Patients are randomized 1:1 to eCTA versus sCTA. The eCTA expands image acquisition caudally, 6 cm below the carina. All patients receive standard-of-care cardiac imaging and diagnostic stroke workup. The primary efficacy endpoint is the diagnosis of a cardioaortic thrombus after at least 30 days of follow-up. The primary safety endpoint is door-to-CTA completion time. The diagnosis of a qualifying ischemic stroke or TIA is independently adjudicated by a stroke neurologist, blinded to the study arm allocation. Patients without an adjudicated ischemic stroke or TIA are excluded from the analysis. The primary outcome events are adjudicated by a board-certified radiologist with subspecialty training in cardiothoracic radiology and a cardiologist with formal training in cardiac imaging. The primary analysis is performed according to the modified intention-to-diagnose principle and without adjustment by logistic regression models. Results are presented with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. CONCLUSION: The DAYLIGHT trial will provide evidence on whether extending a CTA to include the heart results in an increased detection of cardioaortic thrombi compared to standard-of-care stroke workup.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".